
The building of the Glen Canyon Dam—which created
Collection Principles
The collection is rather small. Though no collection principles are stated, the exhibit strives to give voice to both sides of the controversy about the dam. Presumably, the resources that have been digitized were judged to be among the most crucial or interesting. The site explains that “the library's holdings include additional resources which are not yet digitized” and provides a link to submit queries about additional materials.
Object Characteristics
The still images are JPEGs of good quality. The resolution is generally in the range of 650pixels in each dimension. The other objects are generally not of good quality. The film clips I looked at were so small (picture size, I mean) and of such poor resolution as to be practically useless; the film audio is acceptable. The images of documents are JPEG scans of middling to low quality. In some cases they are illegible and useless. Both the audio and video files open in RealPlayer. The RealAudio clips are 96kbps. The RealVideo clips are 47kbps.
Metadata
Within a collection of this size, searching might not be necessary. But the search function provided on the page, called a “Quick Archives Search,” seems to return far more relevant digital images than are easily accessed by browsing. Ultimately, I was unsure of the scope of the collection (or the search), and I was not confident that I was seeing all there was to see. The photos returned by the search are in large collections (100-200 usually) and there is rich collection-level metadata that is basically bibliographic in form but provides some information similar to that found in archival finding aids. The metadata for individual images include tiles (usually “constructed” titles), original size, photographer name, date, call number and film type. Some contain informative captions. The metadata for video and clips provide titles, names of creators and subjects, duration and rights. The film and audio clips are accompanied by bibliographic records including call numbers, summary descriptions and Library of Congress Subject Headings. This metadata would provide access through the library catalog.
Audience
The audience for this collection is probably fairly diverse, including environmental activists, politicians, students, and citizens, especially in
No comments:
Post a Comment